Perhaps the salient feature of Chelsea Conaboy’s 4,000-word screed in the New York Times is its title, “Maternal Instinct is a Myth That Men Created,” together with the fact that she makes essentially no effort to make the case. Or maybe it’s that she claims to have written a book about the neuroscience of parenting, but barely mentions science and, when she does, it’s in the vaguest manner that in no way supports her thesis.
Good stuff. I wonder how these feminist ideologues keep it up. They’ve been going at it in the same key for at least 5 decades now with not a hint of cognitive dissonance. I suppose it helps that biology is actually a constant. That way there can be no actual end to their sense of grievance. I think they like it that way.
Good stuff. I wonder how these feminist ideologues keep it up. They’ve been going at it in the same key for at least 5 decades now with not a hint of cognitive dissonance. I suppose it helps that biology is actually a constant. That way there can be no actual end to their sense of grievance. I think they like it that way.